Recherches sur les Rubá’iyát de ‘Omar Hayyám

Recherches sur les Rubá’iyát de ‘Omar Hayyám. Par Arthur Christensen. Heidelberg, Carl Winters Universität, 1905.

Contents:
Préface
Première partie. Histoire et critique
Deuxième partie. Caractère national et vie littéraire
Troisième partie. L’oeuvre intitulée “Rubá’iyát de ‘Omar Hayyám”
Appendice I. Concordance des principales éditions et de quelques manuscrits des Rubá’iyát de ‘Omar Hayyám
Appendice II. Additions
Corrections

Omar Khayyam

Omar Khayyam. Beveridge, H. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, (1905) (July), pp. 521–526.

As is well known, the authors of the earlier Persian “anthologies do not give specimens of Omar Khayyam’s poetry. In fact, they did not regard him as a poet, but as a hakim, or philosopher, who occasionally wrote verses, and perhaps this view is more correct than the ordinary European one, and the estimate which Omar himself would have made. Poetry with him was the amusement of his leisure hours, and we might style his quatrains, in the words used by Palgrave about Bacon’s stanzas, as “a fine example of a peculiar class of poetry—that written by thoughtful men who practised this Art but little.”

Recherches sur les Ruba’iyat de ‘Omar Khayyam

Recherches sur les Ruba’iyat de ‘Omar Khayyam. Cl. Huart
In: Journal Asiatique, vol. 10 (1905), No. 5, p. 179–183

Review of Christensen’s “Recherches sur les Ruba’iyat de ‘Omar Khayyam”, 1905