Wake! For the Sun …

Wake! For the Sun ... Robert Cowell
In: The Excelsior Sat, Aug 15, 1914 ·Page 3

7 quatrains

Rubaiyat of the Diamond

Rubaiyat of the Diamond. Glen Guernsey
In: The San Francisco Examiner Sun, Apr 09, 1911 ·Page 81

7 quatrains

The Rubaiyat of the slipper-off

The Rubaiyat of the slipper-off. Being quatrains concerning one who climbed on the water wagon and the straps got loose
In: The Morning News Thu, Jan 02, 1913 ·Page 3

Rubaiyat for the Great Society

Rubaiyat for the Great Society. R.J. Hutchinson
In: Clarion-Ledger (Jackson, Mississippi) Tue, Apr 5, 1966, Page 8

6 quatrains

To my Children

To my Children (With apologies to the Rubaiyat)
In: The Lexington Advertiser, Fri, Mar 19, 1909 ·Page 8

6 quatrains

The Rubaiyat of the Hired Man

The Rubaiyat of the Hired Man
In: The Morning Union (Springfield, Massachusetts) · Fri, Nov 24, 1911, Page 8

8 quatrains

Omar Khayyám in German Reformulations: Translation between Politics, Scholarship and Belief

Omar Khayyám in German Reformulations: Translation between Politics, Scholarship and Belief. Amir Theilhaber
In: Sufi non-conformism : antinomian trends in the Persianate cultural traditions. A.A. Seyed-Gohrab (ed.) Amsterdam : Leiden University Press, 2024. (Iranian Studies Series; 32) ISBN: 9789087284541. Pp. 203–226

Summary
Khayyām’s legacy extends to Europe and the present day. Amir Theilhaber’s chapter studies how Khayyām’s quatrains (rubāʿiyyāt) were canonised in the German-speaking world through the translation of Friedrich Rosen (1856–1935), Die Sinnsprüche Omars des Zeltmachers. Rosen was a diplomat and scholar of Oriental studies, who had an impact on Khayyām studies in Europe. Theilhaber examines Rosen’s life and the role Khayyām played in his intellectual and religious life. One of the many interesting topics that Theilhaber examines is how Rosen sees in Khayyām the ideas of a freethinker openly challenging Islamic religious orthodoxy, seeing in the Persian scientist an “Aryan-Indo-Germanic spirit that seeks cognisance, in a cultural war against the dogma of Semitic ‘Arabianness.’” Theilhaber demonstrates how such perverse antisemitic ideas were rightly refuted by scholars such as Ignaz Goldziher. The discussion shows how scholars in modern times treated nonconformist mediaeval ideas to explain the rise and popularity of antinomian movements. Aside from such original insights, Theilhaber’s chapter elaborates upon Rosen’s collaboration with Persian intellectuals such as Taqī Arānī in Berlin.