Zur Textfrage der Vierzeiler Omar’s des Zeltmachers. Rosen, Friedrich. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 80 (1926), pp. 285–313
Archives
Omar Khayyam – a myth?
Omar Khayyam – a myth? A.H. Millar
In: The Morning Post, december 2 1926.
Millar’s aim is to expose Omar Khayyám’s Rubaiyat as a myth.
Omar Khayyam – no myth. A reply to Dr. Millar
Omar Khayyam – no myth. A reply to Dr. Millar. E. Denison Ross
In: The Morning Post, December 6, 1926
Omar Khayyam
Omar Khayyam. Beveridge, H. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, (1905) (July), pp. 521–526.
As is well known, the authors of the earlier Persian “anthologies do not give specimens of Omar Khayyam’s poetry. In fact, they did not regard him as a poet, but as a hakim, or philosopher, who occasionally wrote verses, and perhaps this view is more correct than the ordinary European one, and the estimate which Omar himself would have made. Poetry with him was the amusement of his leisure hours, and we might style his quatrains, in the words used by Palgrave about Bacon’s stanzas, as “a fine example of a peculiar class of poetry—that written by thoughtful men who practised this Art but little.”
The true Omar
The true Omar. C., J.E. [Jessie E. Cadell]. Fraser’s Magazine, New series, 19 (1879) 113, pp. 650–659