Omar once more. A new edition with commentary and bibliographical introduction
In: New York Times, 12 Jan. 1901
Review of the Batson and Ross edition, by the Knickerbocker Press cq Methuen (1900)
Omar once more. A new edition with commentary and bibliographical introduction
In: New York Times, 12 Jan. 1901
Review of the Batson and Ross edition, by the Knickerbocker Press cq Methuen (1900)
The first American edition of the “Rubaiyat”. W.F.Prideaux
In: Academy, Vol. 61, 1901, p.347–348
Some details of the Columbus edition, with a quote from a letter by FFD Albery
The Omar Cult. The Academy, 59 (1900) (July/December) pp. 55-56
The Columbus Edition of the Rubaiyat. Albery, F.F.D. Ohio State Journal, (1900) January 21
Yet more light on Umar-i-Khayyam. Browne, E.G. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, (1899), pp. 409-420
“As Mr. Beverldge has referred to my criticism (which is in reality not mine, but Professor A. Müller’s, cited by Professor Houtsma in a footnote on pp. xiv-xv of his edition of al-Bundárí’s History of the Seljúqs) on the now familiar story of ‘Umar’s covenant with the Nidhámu’l-Mulk and Hasan-i-Sabbah, I should be glad to have an opportunity of stating that my recent reading has shown me that this tale at least reposes on more ancient and respectable authority than either the Rawdatu-s-Safá or the Táríkh-i-Alfí, namely, on that of the Jámi’ú’t-Tawáríkh of Rashídu’d-Dín, who was put to death in a.h. 718.”
Titles supplementary to the Times Saturday Review’s – Contribution to a bibliography – A foreign test. Stanhope Sams
In: New York Times, 22 July 1899.
Apart from some recent English titles a selection is given of the more important translations and editions in foreign languages.
A bibliography prepared for the “Times Saturday Review” – The Golden Treasury Edition. Stanhope Sams
In: New York Times, 10 June 1899.
List of English titles and a selection of some other versions