‘Omar Khayyam. Ross, E. Denison. Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies London Institution, 4 (1927) 3, pp. 433-439.
Archives
Horace and Omar Khayyam
Horace and Omar Khayyam. H.E. Mierow
In: The Classical Weekly, vol. 11 (1917), Oct. 1917-May 1918, p. 19-21
Omar Khayyam – a myth?
Omar Khayyam – a myth? A.H. Millar
In: The Morning Post, december 2 1926.
Millar’s aim is to expose Omar Khayyám’s Rubaiyat as a myth.
Omar Khayyam – no myth. A reply to Dr. Millar
Omar Khayyam – no myth. A reply to Dr. Millar. E. Denison Ross
In: The Morning Post, December 6, 1926
Omar Khayyám
Omar Khayyám
In: Contemporary Review, Vol, 109, 1916, Jan./June, p. 401-404
Review of John Pollen’s translation of 1915
A new rubaiyat
A new rubaiyat
In: Otautau Standard and Wallace Country Chronicle, vol. X, Issue 478, 21 July 1914.
Discusses the discovery of a number of quatrains in an old manuscript, achieved by Hagob Kevorkian, copied by Djadjarmi. The verses included were translated by Joyce Kilmer for The New York Evening Times. (Potter 340)
Omar Khayyám : Some Facts and Fallacies
Omar Khayyám : Some Facts and Fallacies by Reynold A. Nicholson.
In: Aberdeen University Review. Nr. 2 (1914), Feb., p. 138-142
Since FitzGerald introduced him to Europe, Omar Khayyám has enjoyed a world-wide reputation exceeding that of all the rest of the Persian poets together. Does he deserve it? What was his character and philosophy? Was he a materialist or a mystic, or neither? How far is the English version an original poem, and can we fairly use it as a key to the riddle? These are some of the questions that I am going to discuss and in part, I hope, to answer.