In search of Omar Khayyam. Ali Dashti. Translated from the Persian by L.P. Elwell-Sutton. London, Allen & Unwin, 1971. ISBN: 0048910420 (Persian studies monographs; 1). Reprinted by Routledge, 2011.
Archives
Translation or travesty?
Translation or travesty? an enquiry into Robert Graves’s version of some Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. John Charles Edward Bowen. Abingdon, Abbey Press (Berks), 1973. Freshet library, no. 2. IX, 43 p. ISBN: 0900012323.
Summary:
Bowen discusses whether Edward FitzGerald’s (1859) or Robert Graves’s (1967) version of Omar Khayyam’s Rubaiyat is a more accurate translation; it explains the scope of the great Islamic philosophy of Sufism, and questions whether a mystical interpretation of the quatrains accords with Khayyam’s known scepticism; and it quotes conclusive evidence that Robert Graves’s version of the Rubaiyat, so far from having been translated from a manuscript which has lain bidden in the Hindu Kush for the past 800 years, is based on the text of a book published in London in 1899.
A literary study of Edward FitzGerald …
A literary study of Edward FitzGerald, accompanied by an edition of the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, with notes and critical commentary. Kenneth Angyal. Detroit, Wayne State University, 1974.
An empty glass for Omar’s FitzGerald
An empty glass for Omar’s FitzGerald. L.H. Robbins
In: New York Times Magazine, July 2, 1933
Pictures life and times of FitzGerald, and the popularity of the rubáiyát
The quatrains of ‘Omar-i-Khayyam
The quatrains of ‘Omar-i-Khayyam. C.N.S.
In: The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1931 No. 2 (April), p. 457-459
Critical review of Rosen’s edition of 1928.
The Earliest Account of ‘Umar Khayyam
The Earliest Account of ‘Umar Khayyam. Ross, E. Denison. Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, 5 (1929) 3, pp. 467–473
Omar and the new era
Omar and the new era. Achtenhagen, Olga. The English Journal, 16 (1927) 8 (October), pp. 598–602
Students reflecting on reading and thinking about the Rubáiyát.

